USM Logo Text

MARYLAND SENATE BUDGET AND TAXATION SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, BUSINESS AND ADMINISTRATION HEARING ON THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICE FY 2005 BUDGET

February 5, 2004

Testimony of USM Chancellor William E. Kirwan

Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, it's my pleasure to be here today to support the University System of Maryland Office's budget.

Fundamentally, the USM Office exists to help achieve the goals expressed in the legislation establishing the System and subsequent amendments to that legislation.

The USM Office serves as the staff to the Board of Regents; assists USM institutions in fulfilling their individual missions; coordinates the collaborative efforts of USM institutions; facilitates the interactions of the System with the other segments of higher education in the state and the K-12 community; and performs a number of system-wide functions. Some of the USM office functions are specifically mandated by legislation or the direct result of legislation. Others are the ordinary functions you would expect in the corporate office of a $3 billion enterprise.

It is a time of incredible challenges for the System Office. Our goal is to explore and implement opportunities to help advance USM institutions to benefit the State of Maryland. I have dedicated myself to realigning the work of the USM Office to maximize the use of our staff. I think we have been quite successful in adding value to the System as a whole to the extent that resources allow.

Some Recent Accomplishments

I would like to offer a sampling of recent success stories.

Partnerships with Public Schools and Community Colleges

Extending USM Resources

Saving Money Through Collaboration

 

Other Initiatives

A Sampling of FY 2004 Agenda Tasks

Now I would like to mention some items that will occupy our time and attention during the coming months.

 

A Brief Review of the System Office Organization

Office of the Chancellor

The Chancellor is the Chief Executive Officer of the System and the Chief Administrative Officer for the Board of Regents. The Chancellor leads system-wide planning efforts:

Let me briefly describe the most significant work of the office, which is performed in three functional areas - Academic Affairs, Administration and Finance, and Advancement.

Office of Academic Affairs

The office of the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs (VCAA) is responsible for defining and articulating USM academic issues to the System institutions in a way that enables them to achieve excellence and accomplish their own missions within the vision and mission of the System. These responsibilities include:

The office takes a leadership role in efforts such as continuing the System's role in the successful K-16 initiative, and ensuring effective communications with the community colleges and other universities and colleges in the region. The VCAA works with faculty and student groups throughout the USM and the State.

Office of Administration and Finance

The office of the Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance (VCAF) provides leadership, planning and counsel throughout the System in the areas of finance and administration. The major areas of responsibility include:

Office of Advancement

The office of the Vice Chancellor for Advancement (VCA) provides leadership, planning, guidance and direct support in advancement responsibilities. These include:

The office also manages The University of Maryland Foundation, Inc. (UMF) and provides investment management. The System expects to launch a new fund-raising initiative within one year to raise more than $1 billion in new gift support. The VCA position is supported entirely by non-state funds.

System Office Commitment to Accountability

Permeating the activity of the various units within the System Office is a data driven accountability process. We have worked with DBM and MHEC on accountability reporting. The Legislature receives these reports annually. Accountability takes two forms: the State's Managing for Results Program (MFR), and a Peer Comparison System. Accountability indicators include: graduation and retention rates; student satisfaction; departmental rankings; fundraising; and employer satisfaction with our graduates. We have consolidated performance measures for MFR and the peer system. Under MFR, we have met our benchmark in 34% of the indicators, and made progress in another 45% of cases. In 3% we have not gained or lost ground. In 18% of cases we have lost ground versus our starting point.

Regarding comparison with institutional peers across the nation, we are at or above the performance of our competitors in 63% of cases, behind in 37% of the cases. Our commitment to continuous improvement for all of our institutions is grounded in the accurate measurement of success or failure in the context of rigorous performance benchmarks. We take the performance results, highlight areas of need, engage the institutions on areas of concern, and incorporate finding in our planning processes. Overall, we have made great progress, we are growing in eminence. But, there is room for improvement, and we will continue to pursue it.

Also, the Regents' Effectiveness and Efficiency initiative is slated to develop a set of indicators to create an easy to understand set of measures for the overall state of the University System.

 

The System Office Budget Story

I would like to take a few moments to describe the staffing changes for the System Office operations. Many of you will recall the provision in the 1999 governance bill that prohibited the creation of any new positions or the reallocation of any existing positions from an institution to the System Office to implement or administer the new law. The Office is legislatively designed to be small.

In FY 2002, approximately 98 positions were filled. Since that time, 18 positions were eliminated, a reduction of 19% (Table 1). The overall cut in positions for the State government and the USM for state-supported jobs equals approximately 5%.

New responsibilities have emerged. They include support for the Office of Civil Rights Settlement Agreement; the addition of a new educational center in Hagerstown; coordination of collective bargaining system-wide as well as direct negotiation for "coalition" institutions; the Regents' major reengineering initiative mentioned earlier; and the implementation of new accounting standards are major workload additions. Like the USM institutions, we have implemented cost containment measures and will continue to seek cost savings.

The position level at the System Office is the lowest in the history of the USM, yet enrollment is at an all-time high. Based on enrollment, the USM is the thirteenth largest system in the nation. In terms of the System Office operating budget as a percent of the USM total budget, we rank 35th of 47 systems nationally. I find the gap between the relative size of the System and the relative size of the System office to be illuminating and positive (Table 2).

I would like to thank you for your time and attention this afternoon.

University System of Maryland
3300 Metzerott Road
Adelphi, MD 20783-1690, USA
301.445.2740