Corrected Minutes

University System of Maryland
Council of University System Staff

University System of Maryland 
December 12, 2000

Members Present Alternates
Joyce Bauguess (UB) Donna Briscoe (UMB)
Jessica Bird (UMB) Earl Foote (UMUC)
Jeanette Cartron (UMCP) Art Hanlin (FSU)
Dottie Holland (BSU) Judy Lowe (SSU)
Rusty Kinnamon (UMCES)
Starrla Levine (UB) Members Absent
Nathan Long (BSU) John Adams (TU)
Janet Magruder (UMBC) Victoria Adeniran (SSU)
Mike McCrea (UMBI) Nelva Collier-White (UMES)
Patrick McLane (FSU) Sally Davies (UMUC)
Craig Newman (UMCP) Willie Fields (CSC)
Sharon Perkins (CSC) Tim Ford (UMBC)
Sandy Ratke (USM Office) Tina Kreamer (UMUC)
Roy Ross (UMB) Valerie Lashley (FSU)
Susann Shoop (TU) Larry Lauer (UMCP)
Andrianna Stuart (UMCP) Lu Ann Marshall (UMB)
Tammy Trivits (SSU) Richard Rose (USM Office)
Fran Younger (UMCES)
Venus Windmiller (UMBI) Guests
Donald N. Langenberg, Chancellor
USM Office Liaison
Rosario I. van Daalen
Donald Tynes
  1. Call to Order
  2. The meeting was called to order by Roy Ross at 10:05. The honorary chair, the Grinch, presided over the meeting with his gavel.

  3. Approval of Minutes
  4. The minutes from the November 14, 2000 meeting at the University of Maryland, Baltimore were approved with the noted corrections.

  5. Chairs Report
  6. Roy Ross informed the Council that the Chancellor's Council for December was cancelled. Their next meeting will be in January, 2001. The meeting of the Finance Committee of the Board of Regents was also cancelled.

    The Board of Regents met in Full Board on December 8, 2000 at Coppin State College. The discussion involved aspects of their institution - location and impact on the community. They also focused on the differences between CSC and Frostburg State University - Coppin being an inner city institution; how they use former students as mentors and their community outreach centers.

    Collective bargaining was discussed at the end of the BOR meeting. Vice Chancellor Joe Vivona gave a presentation about what collective bargaining would mean to the Regents. Mr. Vivona emphasized what collective bargaining is and encouraged comments. The Regents would be the final say in any negotiation. Regent Nevin stated that the Regents should take a no stand on collective bargaining. The BOR Finance Committee will meet on December 20, 2000 at the System Office in an open meeting to solely discuss collective bargaining.

    The Council then asked questions about what a collective bargaining bill would mean to us. What language is used? Until we see a bill, we can't answer that. What is the position of the individual campuses if the BOR and the Governor support the bill? Individuals will need to make their voices heard with the legislators. How will it directly relate to us? Unknown until we see the language. Who supported SB 245 last year? Was it regionally submitted? There were a lot of Prince George's and Montgomery supporters last year. We're not sure about the support from the Eastern Shore or Western Maryland.

    Other concerns were for the System. What will be the effect on the System? It cost the State thousands of dollars for implementation and we would expect it to run as high for System. The campuses have been asked to estimate the dollar amount needed and the council expressed worry that the cost would cut into merit increases, etc.

    The President's wanted to have collective bargaining by institution, but the BOR said they would want it at the System level.

  7. USM Liaison Report
  8. Donald Tynes spoke about the limited action on collective bargaining. The agenda for the BOR Finance Committee meeting is unknown. The Regents want an open meeting and the Finance Committee will be working with this.

    It would cost two million to implement collective bargaining from a fiscal perspective. It would take three representatives on average to handle the workload. Collective bargaining for the State was a fiscal $0. Now they have 5 people working with it and it's a separate unit.

    System Human Resources Directors are concerned. It is correct that the bill is coming from the Governor's office. The cost will probably be similar but no appropriation was asked for yet. Take into account adding the needed staff at campuses that will have to be hired. The initial phase will be looking at the bill.

    USM Policy on Contingent Employment for Nonexempt and Exempt Staff Employees (VII - 1.40). Changes include: corrections to the definitions section; clarification within the terms and conditions; the conversion of Contingent Category II employees to a Regular Status position after two consecutive years of service in Category II at the same Institution and written performance evaluations under the USM's Performance Development Program guidelines; under benefits, Contingent II employees will be granted leave for jury duty as called to serve and access to participate in the USM's Tuition Remission program; and a new section requiring the CEO of each institution to report on an annual basis (August 1) the usage of contingent employment at their institutions.

    USM Building Excellence Through Staff Training (B.E.S.T.) program covers purpose and applicability; definitions; general guidelines; administration of program; program accountability; and implementation procedures.

    Janet Bacon, new Director of State Legislative Affairs, has replaced Maitland Dade.

  9. Lunch
  10. The Chancellor visited with the Council during lunch. He answered questions from the Council. We also discussed getting the CUSS listserve added to the USM Media Scan.

  11. Committee Reports

Benefits:

The committee is looking into two new areas - dental benefits and the vision plan. There seem to be more complaints being received regarding the dental benefits and the plan. (Providers no longer in plan, etc.) We discussed this at length and decided to forward our concerns to the State through the Human Resources Office. Please send all the concerns to Roy Ross. He will compile them and forward to HR. Employees are having problems with the vision plan also and say they were happier with the separate plan we had before.

The committee