Out of State Undergraduate Applications for First Time Admission by Institution
Export Data: 
 University System of Maryland Out of State Undergraduate Applications for First Time Admission by Institution FY 2008 - 2023 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSU | CSU | FSU | SU | TU | UB | UMBC | UMCP | UMES | |
| TOTAL | |||||||||
| N of Applicants | |||||||||
| 2008 | 1,840 | 1,943 | 687 | 1,802 | 6,091 | 164 | 1,004 | 16,216 | 1,424 |
| 2009 | 1,053 | 1,865 | 609 | 1,887 | 5,868 | 156 | 1,047 | 16,234 | 1,699 |
| 2010 | 872 | 1,623 | 614 | 1,833 | 6,010 | 221 | 1,130 | 14,261 | 1,570 |
| 2011 | 817 | 2,240 | 639 | 2,093 | 6,067 | 202 | 2,321 | 14,149 | 1,497 |
| 2012 | 777 | 2,290 | 599 | 2,673 | 7,546 | 208 | 2,486 | 14,055 | 1,358 |
| 2013 | 874 | 2,007 | 608 | 2,628 | 7,011 | 147 | 2,596 | 14,758 | 1,381 |
| 2014 | 836 | 1,959 | 771 | 2,632 | 7,111 | 120 | 3,201 | 14,566 | 1,672 |
| 2015 | 741 | 1,924 | 538 | 2,404 | 4,017 | 93 | 3,415 | 15,918 | 2,432 |
| 2016 | 2,133 | 2,124 | 582 | 2,321 | 3,730 | 134 | 3,466 | 17,358 | 4,251 |
| 2017 | 4,918 | 2,919 | 464 | 2,316 | 4,382 | 168 | 3,731 | 20,158 | 3,089 |
| 2018 | 6,223 | 3,111 | 406 | 2,651 | 3,512 | 225 | 3,599 | 19,753 | 2,043 |
| 2019 | 2,325 | 4,442 | 435 | 2,236 | 3,471 | 162 | 3,704 | 19,594 | 1,507 |
| 2020 | 2,443 | 2,583 | 740 | 2,274 | 3,286 | 83 | 3,124 | 18,365 | 5,079 |
| 2021 | 2,417 | 950 | 810 | 1,819 | 2,819 | 108 | 2,167 | 32,617 | 4,143 |
| 2022 | 2,439 | 1,401 | 732 | 1,960 | 4,802 | 124 | 2,405 | 38,511 | 3,768 |
| 2023 | 3,043 | 2,358 | 819 | 1,997 | 5,458 | 110 | 2,272 | 40,529 | 4,644 |
| Acceptance Rate | |||||||||
| 2008 | 41% | 40% | 55% | 56% | 65% | 32% | 67% | 35% | 58% |
| 2009 | 51% | 49% | 52% | 56% | 61% | 51% | 64% | 39% | 51% |
| 2010 | 56% | 53% | 51% | 65% | 72% | 41% | 63% | 44% | 43% |
| 2011 | 56% | 36% | 49% | 61% | 67% | 47% | 49% | 45% | 44% |
| 2012 | 54% | 38% | 55% | 60% | 76% | 57% | 51% | 46% | 50% |
| 2013 | 50% | 41% | 50% | 64% | 64% | 74% | 53% | 45% | 54% |
| 2014 | 58% | 49% | 39% | 62% | 62% | 66% | 46% | 47% | 58% |
| 2015 | 63% | 41% | 48% | 65% | 70% | 49% | 45% | 44% | 50% |
| 2016 | 38% | 43% | 51% | 68% | 79% | 52% | 41% | 50% | 39% |
| 2017 | 39% | 37% | 66% | 60% | 78% | 36% | 43% | 46% | 39% |
| 2018 | 39% | 39% | 72% | 48% | 79% | 21% | 45% | 50% | 53% |
| 2019 | 79% | 25% | 71% | 70% | 78% | 25% | 46% | 43% | 62% |
| 2020 | 81% | 39% | 63% | 76% | 77% | 34% | 55% | 54% | 61% |
| 2021 | 87% | 41% | 80% | 86% | 79% | 42% | 74% | 41% | 84% |
| 2022 | 87% | 41% | 79% | 87% | 72% | 24% | 74% | 33% | 86% |
| 2023 | 82% | 47% | 82% | 85% | 76% | 34% | 68% | 35% | 90% |
| Yield | |||||||||
| 2008 | 15% | 14% | 21% | 22% | 21% | 8% | 31% | 24% | 28% |
| 2009 | 22% | 10% | 23% | 20% | 19% | 19% | 31% | 22% | 21% |
| 2010 | 21% | 13% | 23% | 19% | 17% | 11% | 28% | 22% | 22% |
| 2011 | 18% | 11% | 18% | 23% | 19% | 15% | 20% | 23% | 18% |
| 2012 | 18% | 10% | 20% | 19% | 11% | 19% | 18% | 19% | 17% |
| 2013 | 19% | 9% | 23% | 18% | 16% | 15% | 14% | 19% | 19% |
| 2014 | 14% | 6% | 22% | 16% | 16% | 16% | 16% | 18% | 10% |
| 2015 | 16% | 9% | 21% | 15% | 25% | 7% | 13% | 17% | 19% |
| 2016 | 12% | 10% | 26% | 17% | 22% | 51% | 12% | 17% | 9% |
| 2017 | 8% | 7% | 25% | 15% | 18% | 30% | 14% | 18% | 10% |
| 2018 | 6% | 8% | 24% | 15% | 21% | 15% | 13% | 23% | 9% |
| 2019 | 7% | 8% | 27% | 15% | 18% | 10% | 18% | 9% | |
| 2020 | 11% | 18% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 11% | 14% | 4% | |
| 2021 | 11% | 10% | 14% | 14% | 13% | 16% | 12% | 14% | 2% |
| 2022 | 13% | 13% | 13% | 16% | 9% | 13% | 13% | 4% | |
| 2023 | 10% | 9% | 18% | 15% | 7% | 5% | 11% | 14% | 5% |
| Source: USM Institutional Research Information System |