UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND BOARD OF REGENTS
June 22, 2005
Minutes of the Public Session
Chairman: David H. Nevins
Vice Chairman: Robert L. Pevenstein
Secretary: Robert L. Mitchell
Assistant Secretary: Nina Rodale R. Houghton
Treasurer: Orlan Johnson
Assistant Treasurer: Patricia S. Florestano
Chairman Kendall moved, Regent Rosapepe seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.
Chairman Kendall warmly recognized Regent Nevins as the new Board Chair. Chancellor Kirwan commended Regent Kendall for his service as the Board of Regents Chairman.
Chairman Kendall expressed his appreciation for the comments and thanked all for their support of him as Board Chair. Chairman Kendall also congratulated Regents Nevins and Pevenstein in their new leadership roles.
D. Report of the Councils
Chairman Kendall introduced Joel Willcher as the new Student Regent, who will join the Board on July 1.
E. Committee on Education Policy - Regent Florestano,
1. Minutes of June 1, 2005 Meeting.
2. New Academic Program Proposals
The follow Program Proposals were presented by Regent Florestano and moved for approval:
Regent Mitchell seconded - unanimously approved.
Regent Mitchell seconded - unanimously approved.
Regent Mitchell seconded - unanimously approved.
Regent Johnson seconded - unanimously approved.
Regent Mitchell seconded - unanimously approved.
3. Amendment of II-1.00 Policy on Appointment, Rank and Tenure of Faculty to add to the List of Approved Ranks in Section III the Title of "[Institution] Professor. " Regent Florestano explained that this rank is in practice on campuses across the country. It is sometimes called a " Professor of Practice." An individual who is outstanding in his/her field is not paid because he or she has a full-time paying job, but may be desirous of working within an academic setting to contribute to a particular discipline Chancellor Kirwan cited NIST and NIH employees as examples. Regent Florestano moved, Regent Mitchell seconded and it was unanimously approved.
4. Guidelines on Non-USM Institutions Offering Programs at USM Regional Centers. Regent Florestano moved, Regent Mitchell seconded and it was unanimously approved.
5. Reorganization of Academic Departments at UMBC - information item.
6. Update on the Eastern Shore Higher Education Center -information item.
7. Reports on Academic Advising - information item.
a. Coppin State University
b. University of Maryland, Baltimore County
c. University of Maryland Eastern Shore
The committee has been reviewing advising programs at all of the degree-granting institutions at its meetings. Regent Florestano commended the institutional representatives for their superb reports and their effective programs.
8. Campus Crime Reports - information item.
9. Update on Implementation of Recommendation of Financial Aid Task Force - information item. A report will be coming out at the end of the summer with more detailed information of how the campuses are implementing the task- force's recommendations.
10. Summary of Program Actions Taken by Chancellor under Delegation of Authority, 2004-2005. Regent Florestano presented the annual report with seven actions this year (report on file).
F. Committee on Finance - Regent Nevins
Regent Nevins moved for approval of items 1 and 2 together:
1. FY 2007 Capital Budget Request and System Priority Listing;
FY 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Program, and
FY 2007-2016 Ten Year Capital Plan.
Regent Nevins stated the only item that the Board is committed to vote on today is the System Priority Listing, the actual request that will go to the Governor's office. The Board will review the items for out-years in the future.
2. FY 2006 System Funded Construction Program Request
Regent Nevins moved for approval of agenda items 1 and 2, seconded by Regent Gill and unanimously approved.
Regent Nevins added that Finance Committee will report back to the Board on the development of a policy to promote private giving in support of capital construction. Secondly, the Committee is working on a proposal to determine how to incorporate deferred maintenance costs into future capital budget requests. Finally, the Finance Committee will appoint a group to review (and possibly make recommendations to improve) the capital budget process.
Regent Mitchell requested clarification of the System Priority Listing and exactly what items will be sent to the Governor for approval. Regent Nevins stated that all items on the listing will be submitted for approval, the total amount of $172M.
Regent Nevins asked that a vote be take on items 3 and 4 together.
3. USM: Technical Amendments to USM Procurement Policies and Procedures
4. UMCP: Leave for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Task Force
Regent Nevins moved, Regent Florestano seconded, and the Board unanimously approved items 3 and 4.
5. UMUC: Group Tuition- Regent Nevins moved, Regent Pevenstein seconded, and it was unanimously approved.
6. USM: Quarterly Review of Capital Improvement Projects -information item
G. Report of the Workgroups
1. Capital Campaign Work Group - Regent Houghton
The System is actively gearing up for the Capital Campaign and this fall will be critical in terms of Campaign preparation at each institution. Regent Houghton will give regular briefings to the Board on major gifts received, beginning with the transformational gift to Towson University of $10.2M from the Robert M. Fisher Memorial Foundation, established by Jess and Mildred Fisher.
The Workgroup and USM Office hosted a series of a development training programs with Marts & Lundy consultant John Cash for the USM leadership, USM Presidents and Vice Presidents for Advancement. Several VP's for Finance and Administration attended as well. Plans are underway for more training programs. In April Regent Gill and Vice Chancellor Schwab visited several individuals at UVA, which is currently preparing for a $3 billion dollar campaign.
Regent Gill summarized the Capital Campaign activities underway at UVA. He highlighted several items he felt distinguished UVA's efforts:
2. Effectiveness and Efficiency Work Group Report - Chairman Kendall stated that he would like our state to be a national leader in this area. He said the main focus of the E&E effort has been to reduce the University System cost structure while increasing its quality and value to the citizens of Maryland. The Committee has been committed to the needs of external constituents and to a transparent process open to citizens, employees, oversight agencies and the media. The first E&E Committee meeting was less than two years ago in July of 2003.
The most recent accomplishment of the group was the report of the Organizational Review Subgroup. The Review was started early this year and completed June 30, 2005. Chairman Kendall asked the Chancellor to give a brief summary of the report. Chancellor Kirwan stated that the subgroup was charged to analyze four "special purpose institutions," those that did not fit the traditional model of four-year degree-granting institutions. They include:
Chairman Kendall presented a motion to accept the Chancellor's report which the E&E Committee has unanimously approved. It was seconded by Regent Nevins and unanimously approved. Regent Rosapepe stated the conclusion assumes a 3% increase per year in state funding. Regent Rosapepe wanted to emphasize that because, by endorsing this, we are committing ourselves to protecting the research centers. Chancellor Kirwan will present a report to the Board on the progress on the IHV issue.
Chairman Kendall - The E&E Workgroup is preparing a series of dashboard indicators for each institution. The indicators are based on the themes in the strategic plan. This project will assist the board in managing information and accountability.
Old Business - Student Misconduct Policy
Chancellor Kirwan presented the status of the policy revision (copies of the current policy and the proposed revision were distributed at the meeting). Chancellor Kirwan stated that the major change in the redraft of the policy was to include "probation before judgment" as a reason for disciplinary action. There was a discussion by the Board and several Presidents. Following this discussion the policy will be redrafted and presented fur further consideration at a future Board meeting.
H. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m.
Audiotapes of the meeting are on file in the Office of the Board of Regents